Thursday, July 18, 2019

Napoleon Bonaparte Heir or Betrayer Essay

cat sleep Bonaparte has been one of the biggest know drop deaders and highly debated characters. Known for his leadership skills, but debated for the legion(predicate) disparate interpretations of his actions. or so historians have believed that sleep is either an inheritor or a Betrayer. It was done his actions on how you gouge butt against how Napoleon is considered a double-crosser to the french revolution. This is shown through and through different actions and the way he handled certain situations. The prime(prenominal) sign that he was a betrayer against the french revolution was that he was establish as an irresponsible dictator.Also, Napoleons betrayal is pictured with the unnecessary wars that bankrupted France due to the idea of expanding his world(a) brotherhood. Lastly, Napoleons actions were considered to be on the whole contradictory to the french revolution motto of Liberty equality Fraternity. As you can see through these three arguments, that Nap oleon proves that he actu whollyy is a betrayer to the french revolution. The foundation of the french revolution was that the sight cherished to get rid of the absolute monarchy that had no interest in serving the third estate. Napoleon on the other hand, did the arctic of what the french revolution wanted.He keep power, and became an absolute dictator that made all the decisions in his own interest. With all this power, Napoleon showed that he was a betrayer, because he did not do anything for the good of the people, rather he did it for his own interests. One example, is that instead of allowing people to vote, Napoleon open up representative institutions that however gave the illusion of democracy because really they had no power. Also, in the beginning of his dictatorship, he constituted the Coup DEtat which made himself the eldest consul which later on allowed him to crown himself Emperor.This can be considered a betrayal because he was crowning himself king in a s ense. Clearly, these arguments show how Napoleon, although a great leader, was besides focusinged on the power that he obtained from becoming Emperor and it clouded his decisions do him to become a betrayer to the cut revolution. Another big part of wherefore people consider Napoleon as a betrayer to the French revolution, was his forbidding quest for personal glory and his want to conquer more than he could. Napoleons allegiance to make e very(prenominal)body into a brotherhood completely went against what the French Revolution stood for.This is shown in his some(prenominal) unnecessary wars that took place. He started recruiting mass armies for the furbish up purpose of conquering other lands. Napoleons focus on universal conquest was shown by the year 1812, when around every acres besides Russia, Great Britain, and the Ottoman Empire, were beneath his give. Another horizon that shows how Napoleon betrayed the French revolution was when he implemented the Continenta l System, in which he resorted to economic state of war by forbidding his subjects and allies to backing with the English. Thus, further more affecting the already poor economy and worsening ties with England.These actions gift Napoleon as somebody who is simply set on European check into and showing how his military focus lead his straying away from the idealistic French revolution. The French revolutions motto was Liberty par and Fraternity. The French expected Napoleon to respect these sayings and bring back peace, order and to merge the political and social conquests of the Revolution. only, Napoleon utilise other means of establishing a revolution. opposed the motto, Napoleon used certain things often(prenominal) as censorship, the power of terror, and even implementation to establish control.Napoleon to keep control of public opinion, he censored almost everything, and filtered what the people could hear. Also, Napoleon used the aspect of fear to keep people und er his control, and he used force to subsidise anybody going against his will, thus showing how he did not follow the motto of the French Revolution. Also when he was in power, he rolled back many of the reforms of the Revolution, including the rights of women and rudimentary protections for civil liberties. He anointed himself emperor and established his family members as hereditary monarchs of sovereign European nations.In this sense, he completely eviscerated the large reforms of the revolution. This depicts how Napoleon truly went against the motto of the French Revolution and showed how he truly was not an Heir, rather a betrayer. Napoleon to this very day is still argued as whether he is an heir or a betrayer. But in many cases, he is seen to be a Betrayer to the French revolution. This is shown through different ways, such as his absolute dictatorship and how he uses his total control of power to make decisions for his own interest. This shows how Napoleon became what the F rench revolution sought push through to get rid of with the start of the revolution.Also, with his many attempts at European domination, you can see that Napoleon put too much focus onto wars and campaigns, instead of trying to bring in equality for everyone. Lastly, the revolution was about improperness and rights, as said in the French revolutions motto. But Napoleon went against that, and denied the peoples liberty, and their rights with things such as censorship and execution. Overall, you clearly see how Napoleon, in many situations, goes against what the French revolution stands for and shows how he really is a betrayer of the revolution.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.